Saturday, July 1, 2023

Making danger more dangerous

Note in advance: This is from what I think I know and not checked for accuracy.

CYP stands for Cross Yarra Partnership, a government organisation to oversee and ensure a smooth construction of Melbourne's Metro Tunnel, a long underground railway system. 

Near to us a new train station is being built. While we thought we were far enough away to not be affected, we have at times been greatly affected by local road closures, footpath closures. At the moment we can't turn right coming from the direction of the city and so if coming in from the east on the toll road, we are close to being forced to use the Domain Tunnel at a significant extra cost. Any other way to get home will take much longer. Believe me, I've tried.

There has been much work happening below. Residents in our building are angry that all parking in front of building will be removed for the construction of a separated bicycle lane. While people are generally not against the safer protected bicycle only lane, the God of Cars rule, with two lanes for motor cars, a cycling lane and no parking. Nowhere for delivery drivers to park. In advance our public post box has been removed so parking for the postal van is not required. The disabled parking space will be gone, where my brother parks while Mother gets out of the car. He then unloads her walker and she is soon at our building. It will be a much longer walk, which she simply cannot do. Fortunately we have one car with two parking spaces, so he can park within the building but that means him calling us, us going down to let him in, then meeting him on our parking level at the second floor level, and moving our car forward for his car to park behind. 

A few weeks ago when the right turn was banned below, barriers were put and pedestrian told to walk 100 metres towards the city to cross the road and 100 metres back. People did not comply and continued to cross the road below using an west to east traffic lane. I can't see why some kind of temporary safe crossing could not have been built. In its wisdom, CYP put up another fence yesterday, to deter pedestrians. The fence has deterred some but for the more determined to cross at this point, they are in even greater risk as they now need to walk along the fence on the roadway in either direction to reach the footpath on the other side. Hopefully the photos will make that clearer. 

People were just walking around the orange barrier into the traffic lane and then going towards the former pedestrian crossing point. You can see the newly erected fence on the far side of the street. People are now walking on the roadway to get around the fence to cross the road.


These people waiting to cross would have walked along the roadway to get to this point. 

And cross they did. 



CYP or its contractors has made a bad situation even more dangerous. I spend a good bit of time on our balcony looking down, and I cannot see any reason why pedestrians could not have been catered for with a temporary crossing, moved at times as the works dictated. If someone actually looked with an overall view of the crossing before this crossing was 'closed', people's behaviour was perfectly predictable, rather like goat tracks, now called desire lines. Here is a classic example of desire lines and again, perfectly predictable human behaviour. I am unqualified in any profession yet a probably highly paid planner designed the footpath, and even without seeing the desire line path, I can tell in advance where people will walk, as I am sure you can. 

For anyone who thinks an extra 200 metres to walk is nothing, you have no imagination of what it is like to get old. 

Later edit: This Saturday evening so many people are crossing the road, dodging around the fencing. 

39 comments:

  1. It sounds a complete nightmare. These days it seems pedestrians aren't even an afterthought. They just don't exist in this universe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JayCee, nightmares are brief. Ours has been going on for about three years or longer and perhaps the worst will be over by the end of this year. Pedestrians seem to come in at about fourth in the pecking order.

      Delete
  2. Ack. That looks and sounds VERY dangerous. And an extra 200 metres each way is close to half a kilometre.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EC, you were binned today, haha. Actually it is 100 metres each way, still a significant distance.

      Delete
  3. You need the Nation Building Authority (‘Utopia’) to come to the rescue - they’d try hard to fix the problem and have you all in stitches doing so. Plenty of fun to watch from the balcony!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cathy, didn't you know? We were featured in one episode.

      Delete
  4. Desire lines? I like Goat tracks much better. Depending on the amount of traffic I might be one of those walking along the road to get to the crossing, but if traffic was heavy I'd have no trouble walking the extra 200 metres. I might grumble about it, but I do prefer to not get knocked over by cars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. River, I prefer goats tracks too, but I admit desire lines is easier to understand. The intersection does still have a the walking lights functioning, so as long as you take normal care, you will be ok. I wouldn't do it with kids in tow though.

      Delete
  5. That does look like a terrible situation. Someone didn't think this through very thoroughly. (I love how all the pedestrians are walking right in front of that police car, which clearly isn't about to try to stop them!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Steve, yes I was wondering myself, half expecting a head out the police car window to yell at the offenders.

      Delete
  6. You know a lot about this big build project. It has been a nightmare that I am becoming more of a "burb" guy now. Avoid CBD at all costs. Mum cannot walk far these days either, but I still try to walk her for a minimum of 10 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roentare, we drive if we have to, otherwise it is tram and train. I don't need the driving and parking stress. Make sure you keep your mum walking, however short the walk is.

      Delete
  7. That looks as if the needs of John and Jane Q Public have been totally overlooked. The 'no parking' thing would be very aggravating.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Debby, not just me but others have sent emails, letters and queries, to no avail. As I said above, pedestrians come after cars, trams and bicycles. Even with what will be terrific bike lanes, still there will some illegally riding on the footpaths.

      Delete
  8. Andrew ..why is this so….In May while you were a travelling man, we were in Melb . we flew in this time and a car took us to South Yarra . It seemed inordinately long as we went though a tunnel to reach S. Yarra Going back to the airport we swung round the back of Melbourne over the Westgate and on to the exit to the Airport, a much quicker drive Why is it so? That was the week of that earthquake which we slept through.
    The mess around where you live is awful for everyone but the workers . We have taken to use the train into Fed Square if we go to the city. We haventbt been out to Carlton by tram since the building works began . I do love Melbournes trams but that intersection from Toorak road is diabolical

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. $11+ in City Link fees for that drive. That's the Burnley Tunnel, with its pacer light system that cars are supposed to speed match. We've managed to avoid using and paying for that one for some years. Your trip back to the airport avoided tolls and probably didn't take much longer. We have used that way ourselves in the past.
      While I am well used to the intersection below and do understand how (very obviously) difficult it can be to strangers, it is much safer even as it is than it was in the noughties. There were often crashes below, sometimes serious. I can't remember the last time I saw a crash down there, aside from two cars being hit by trams when the cars tried to make an illegal U turns.

      Delete
  9. Without a disabled parking space, our relatives would be excluded from family functions and afternoon teas :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hels, I appreciate that. You don't think about such things when you are younger. Mind, in at least two public car parks I've noticed an excess of disabled parking spaces, never used.

      Delete
  10. I bet the roads and highway is different. We just bike lanes put in Bonners Ferry.
    Coffee is on, and stay safe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dora, which will be painted lines on the road I imagine. They do not stop straying traffic, but are a good start.

      Delete
  11. Wow that sounds so dangerous. can't believe they didn't check where the desire line was. You keep safe during this time. Progress is so disruptive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Diane, this is not our VicRoads at work and I have a feeling that it may have acted very differently. This is not an organisation set up to take pedestrians into account in any manner except obvious safety, and they have failed on that. It is progress though and it will be a terrific asset once completed.

      Delete
  12. I bet whoever designed this did so in the comfort of their office and haven't even been down to the site. Pretty designs on a computer with absolutely no common sense involved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Caro, I would agree with if not the fact that this second fence has been added, so I expect someone has looked at what has been happening, and then reacted impractically. Indeed what looks good a screen does not translate to what happens in real life.

      Delete
  13. Might as well take the jaywalking laws off the books

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kirk, Australian pedestrians are terribly disobedient at traffic lights much to the horror of those visiting from some strict European countries. There are blitzes on pedestrians every so often in the city but otherwise such behaviour is ignored by the police unless blatantly stupid or dangerous.

      Delete
  14. The authorities have no consideration for others at all in this situation.
    Wait till they are effected and then it will be different.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It sounds a pot mess. 'Planning' is unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JB, I guess what looks like chaos is closely planned but the thinking process of those in charge is beyond me.

      Delete
  16. You need city officials living in the building,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not quite a city official but a former public media identity and politician lives here. I believe he has tried, again to no avail.

      Delete
  17. That sounds like a nightmare and death or injury eventually a result. The new plans aren't great for your building, sounds like, if anyone is disabled in some way, who visits or tries to come or go on foot or in wheelchair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Strayer, it really is the loss of the disabled parking space that concerns me the most. Not so much for us but for others. It seems just so wrong.

      Delete
    2. It does seem wrong. By law here, businesses and apartments must have accomodating park spots.

      Delete
    3. There is no visitor parking in our building at all. Councils where public transport is good are trying to discourage car ownership and a couple of apartment have gone up without parking and no on street parking permit allowed.

      Delete
  18. Sounds like here. Cars Rule is the bane of my existence. I take my life into my hands when I cross on a walk signal. We now have to be careful getting off the bus, not at the curb, because the taxis ignore the space reserved for the bus, and park there anyway, that we are not knocked down by a bike.
    I could go on and on. Trucks parking in bike lanes, no adequate spaces for deliveries, cops allowing cars to turn on pedestrian walk signals, construction everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What can I say Jackie but it's the same here. We knew we were not going to live on peaceful streets when we moved here.

      Delete
  19. What a mess! At least our temporary suburban neighborhood detours, however annoying some days, improved water lines.

    ReplyDelete

I no understand

Transport for New South Wales, TfNSW, is changing its in train announcements. There was only mention of three I read about in the Sydney Mor...